News - Comment

Pakistan: Court tells Raja to ‘pass the buck’ to avoid Gilani fate

The Supreme Court has been asking the PPP led coalition government to revive the cases against the Zardari since December 2009, when it struck down a graft amnesty decree of Gen Musharraf that benefited Zardari and over 8,000 others. Prime Minister Raja's predecessor Gilani was unseated from Parliament after he failed to act on the Court's directions.

Poreg View:  Raja Pervez Ashraf, the 60-day old Prime Minister of Pakistan, has no reason after Monday, Aug 27, to grumble that the activist judiciary is hauling him on the coals over Zardari’s riches allegedly stored in Swiss bank vaults. The apex court itself has shown the middle way to escape the fate that his predecessor Syed Yousaf Reza Gilani had met in the contempt of court case.

Sections of Pak civil society view the judicial insistence as judicial over reach. Impartial observers are,  however, amused at the muddled way the PPP leadership handled the case. Humility could have saved the day for the government.The court gave him two options on writing the letter to Swiss for help in the Zardari riches case. One: the law minister writes the letter. Two: the Attorney General (AG) is authoriesed to settle the issue.  Which way Raja will adopt will be known when the hearing resumes after three weeks on September 18. The bench has declined to exempt him from personal appearance before the bench.

The court assured PM Raja that it would settle this matter with the authorized person as it is ready to address their concerns on presidential immunity as well. The five-member bench headed by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa could have waved the green flag on Monday itself had the Prime Minister committed to either of the two options presented to him.  

During the hearing, the court kept asking Raja Ashraf to commit to implement the NRO judgment delivered in December last year, but the premier remained reluctant. Justice Khosa said, “If you will not give a commitment then law will take its own course.”

Justice Athar Saeed, expressing serious concerns over the anti-judiciary statements issued by PPP leaders, asked the PM to direct his ministers as well as Punjab Governor Latif Khosa to avoid giving derogatory remarks against the judiciary on TV channels.

However, Raja Ashraf stated that he would take serious efforts to understand and settle the issue. The court also said they wanted the government to write a letter to the Swiss authorities and ignore the one previously written by former attorney general Malik Qayyum. The court only wanted implementation of para 178 of the NRO judgment in letter and spirit. “We don’t like to prosecute anyone and neither mentioned anyone’s name in the judgment.”

Raja Pervez Ashraf is the second Prime Minister to face a contempt charge for refusing to revive the corruption cases against Zardari in Switzerland. His predecessor, Yousuf Raza Gilani, was convicted of contempt and disqualified in June.  Ashraf asked the bench to take back the show cause notice for contempt of court that was issued to him on August 8 as it could have an adverse impact on his upcoming visit to China.

However, the judges did not accede to his request. Justice Khosa said the premier had come to the court not as an accused but as the premier of an honourable nation.

The Supreme Court has been asking the PPP led coalition government to revive the cases against the President since December 2009, when it struck down a graft amnesty that benefited Zardari and over 8,000 others. The government stuck to the stand that as the President Asif Ali Zardari enjoys immunity in Pakistan and abroad.

While sections of Pakistani civil society view the judicial insistence as judicial over reach, impartial observers are amused at the muddled way the PPP leadership has been dealing the case. Humility and frankness could have saved the hiccups the government and the nation as a whole experienced. Because it is not an everyday occurrence that the apex court sends the chief political executive that is the prime minister packing home.

Also sending a PM home is not a small thing, for a failing state like Pakistan which has gained ‘its democratic footing after a long, tough and persistent struggle’ over 65 years. Gilani and his colleagues could have easily avoided the humiliation had they written the letter the court had asked them to write. A letter is no guarantee of prompt and swift action. More over, it doesn’t ipsofacto signal reopening of the case in Switzerland since under the Swiss law, a closed case can be reopened only if there is substantive new evidence. Where is the evidence, for love or money?

Sharing:

Your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *